portrait of writer and his city

Portrait of a writer and his city

My review of Pamuk's Istanbul; it appeared in today's Business

Standard and the link is here but the para breaks on the website are

meaningless as always. So here's the full review:

------------------

In the first chapter of this part-autobiography, part-tribute to his

beloved city, Orhan Pamuk speaks of writers like Conrad and Naipaul,

who "managed to migrate between languages, cultures countries,

continents, even civilisations. Their imaginations were fed by

exile...mine, however, requires that I stay in the same city,on the

same same street, in the same house, gazing at the same view.

Istanbul's fate is my fate".

It isn't inappropriate for the author to mention his own name in the

same breath as Conrad and Naipaul. In recent years, especially

following the international publication of My Name is Red and Snow,

Pamuk has moved from being Turkey's best-known man of letters to being

considered one of the world's great fiction writers, and a future

Nobel candidate. This makes it difficult to think of Istanbul as just

a paean to a city: it can't be treated purely as a travelogue, or even

as a personal remembrance by a lesser-known writer. The appeal of this

book depends equally on the insights it provides into Pamuk;s life and

how he became the writer he is today. From that point of view, a

certain amount of familiarity with his fiction is recommended before

reading this.

Pamuk begins his memoir on an intimate scale, with descriptions of his

early life in the five-storey apartment block his large family

occupied in the 1950s. He speaks of family squabbles, sibling rivalry,

secret fantasy worlds and of childhood quirks that persisted into

adulthood ("I have in all honesty believed that two people with

similar names must have similar characters, that an unfamiliar word

must be semantically similar to a word spelt like it..."). Then the

world outside the apartment weaves its way into the narrative and the

book's structure turns schizophrenic. A discussion of the painter

Melling's depictions of the Bosphorus river is immediately followed by

an unrelated chapter that gives us little Orhan in his house, making

up games to deal with boredom (his account of adjusting a mirror

triptych so that he could see the reflections of thousands of Orhans,

many of them unfamiliar-looking, evokes the splintered, kaleidoscopic

narrative of My Name is Red). Another chapter on the lives and work of

four of Turkey's great writers (including the poet Yahya Kemal) is

followed incongruously by a personal account of Pamuk's grandmother.

At other times a more careful link is established, as when the author

recalls the various signs he saw on the city's streets as a child, and

then, to understand the "civilising mission" that these signs

embodied, turns to a discussion of Istanbul's newspaper columnists and

city correspondents. This structure, or lack of it, marks an

intriguing experiment but at times it almost feels like Pamuk is

trying too hard for a freewheeling effect as he places the city's life

against his own.

According to Pamuk, the chief characteristic of Istanbul is the

quality of huzun, the Turkish word for melancholy -- "not the

melancholy of a solitary individual but the black mood shared by

millions of people together". Much of this stems from Istanbul's

position as a city that stands at the crossroads of East and West (it

is situated in both Europe and Asia), and as a once-great capital now

reduced to ruins, bedevilled by reminders of its own lost glory.

(Pamuk believes a key difference between his city and, say, Delhi or

Sao Paulo, is that "in Istanbul the remains of a glorious past and

civilisation are everywhere visible".) At any rate, this very

particular form of melancholy is a theme that runs through the book,

much like the Bosphorus winding through the city.

The author also writes movingly of Istanbul's love-hate relationship

with the western gaze: of "the ambivalence that besets literary

Istanbullus on reading Western observations" about their city. He

counts the tankers, liners and fishing boats that go up and down the

river, and brings the clarity of a nightmare to an image of a looming

Soviet warship rising out of the mist. In bringing the many shades of

the city to life, he is aided by a wealth of black-and-white

photographs (many of them by the famous Ara Guler) that are spread

across the pages of this book; the pictures don't quite illuminate the

text in the intense, immediate way that, for instance, the ones in W G

Sebald's works do, but Istanbul would have been a lesser book without

them, especially for a reader who is unfamiliar with the city.

Personally, I was more interested in the portions that dealt with

Orhan's life and his muses (there's a beautiful chapter on his first

love), and the frisson-creating little moments that echo scenes from

his novels. But those portions can't be sieved out from the whole,

since, as the author admits, his own soul is part of the city's. This

book is so full of detailed information about Istanbul that it's easy

to overlook how much it reveals about Pamuk himself. In many ways,

it's more candid than a conventional autobiography might have been.

Istanbul isn't always an easy read though. Some passages -- how to say

this about a favourite author without flinching -- just aren't as

engaging as they should be. Pamuk isn't really capable of being

uninteresting but he comes close here occasionally, especially in a

couple of descriptions that amount to little more than endless

processions of semi-colons ("...of the mosques whose lead plates and

steel gutters are forever being stolen; of the city cemeteries that

seem like gateways to another world, and their cypress trees; of the

little children in the streets who try to sell the same packet of

tissues to every passer-by; of the clock towers no one ever

notices...")

Whatever its shortcomings, however, Istanbul is an affectionate and

informative work that has something in it both for Pamuk enthusiasts

and for those who seek an understanding of a great historical centre

(even though the book is unlikely to satisfy either group completely).

And for a work that obsesses so much about melancholia and a forgotten

past, it ends on a heartwarmingly forward-looking note: "I don't want

to be an artist," the young Orhan Pamuk tells his mother. "I'm going